Feature

Sweden’s Nato accession: a cyberattack-filled saga

Turkey and Hungary’s objections were far from Sweden’s only obstacle in joining Nato, cybersecurity experts say. Alex Blair reports.

Swedish flag-raising ceremony at the Nato Headquarters on 11 March. Credit: Dursun Aydemir / Getty Images

Sweden’s accession to the Nato alliance was far from a smooth process. While the objections of Turkey and Hungary stole headlines as the main obstacle, there was also massive disruption caused by a deluge of cyberattacks on Sweden as knowledge of the pending Nato membership became public. 

Sweden turned into a prime target for distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks after it formally applied to join Nato in May 2022, according to a report published 2 May 2024, by cybersecurity experts NETSCOUT. 

“When Sweden’s Foreign Minister hinted at Hungary’s approval of their bid to join Nato on February 14, the onslaught began, with attack volume increasing to 636 on February 15”, the report states. “This signalled a spike in unseen tensions and retaliation from several politically motivated hacker groups. In fact, Russian hackers disrupted government operations in Sweden via ransomware attacks.” 

DDoS attacks on Sweden have ramped up considerably from late 2023 into 2024. The peak on 15 February represented a 315% increase compared to the same date in 2023.

Why did Sweden join Nato?

Cyberattacks by pro-Kremlin groups are emblematic of the pressure Sweden felt to shelter under Nato’s Article 5 mutual defence guarantee. 

Stockholm’s ambitions to join Nato date back to 1994, when Sweden had just joined the Partnership for Peace, a Nato program for 19 core and fringe members across Europe. 

What pushed Sweden and its Nordic neighbour Finland over the edge was, of course, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

Unlike Finland, Sweden does not share a border with Russia. Many Swedes wanted to maintain the country’s traditional military neutrality, but a growing feeling of endangerment prompted Swedish diplomats’ calls for Nato accession to grow stronger.

Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson pronounced it a “historic day” when Sweden became a full Nato member on 7 March.

Will Nato membership bolster Sweden’s cybersecurity?

Whether or not joining Nato will strengthen Sweden’s cyber defences remains unclear, according to Richard Hummel, threat intelligence lead at NETSCOUT. 

“It is much too early to tell how this move and joining Nato will impact [Sweden’s] cybersecurity space”, Hummel tells Army Technology. “Regardless of what political camp, world power, or partnership one joins, the act of securing networks and assets is a difficult and arduous process that often takes time to implement properly.” 

Even though many of the same pro-Kremlin cybergangs are involved – NoName057, Anonymous Sudan, Russian Cyber Army Team, Killnet – the volume of cyberattacks on Sweden go beyond those inflicted on other Nato members. 

Poland, for instance, suffered a drastic surge in cyberattacks following the election of pro-EU Prime Minister Donald Tusk in December. 

Sweden has also been targeted with an unprecedentedly wide range of attacks, from government agencies to online shopping services

“Sweden is already quite good at handling DDoS attacks as they’ve been pummelled for years with only minor impacts from time to time,” Hummel adds. “It stands to reason they will continue to remain steadfast in their determination to ensure networks and the internet remain easily and readily accessible throughout the country.” 

Why did Turkey and Hungary initially block Sweden from Nato?

Turkey and Hungary, Nato’s most pro-Russia members, both repeatedly opposed Sweden’s accession. 

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan pointed to the activities of the PKK, a Kurdish militant group in Sweden, as well as restrictions on arms exports to Ankara. 

Erdogan eventually dropped his objections last July after months of accession hardball – but not before securing significant economic, military and diplomatic gains. 

Hungary continued to drag its feet. While Prime Minister Viktor Orbán never provided any specific justification, most pointed to Hungarian politicians’ continued friendliness with their Russian counterparts. 

Orbán eventually U-turned in February, sweetened by a new military deal for Sweden to sell Hungary four more Gripen jets to add to its current stockpile of 14. 

The benefits of Sweden’s Nato accession are mutual. Stockholm receives greater protection. Its military shortcomings were exposed in 2013 when Russian bomber plans were able to simulate an attack on Stockholm and Sweden needed Nato to help repel them. 

On the flipside, adding Sweden to its ranks offers Nato the geopolitically strategic island of Gotland, a key hub for deploying troops in a conflict. 

Nato also benefits from increased firepower. Stockholm is the world’s 13th-largest arms exporter, with a growing defence industry comprising more than 200 manufacturers. 

Attention in Stockholm now turns to the Nato-derived possibility of greater access to the world-leading cybersecurity systems of the US, the Netherlands or France. 

Go to article: Home | Military SATCOM: is UK defence fit for purpose?Go to article: Editor's letterGo to article: ContentsGo to article: Bombardier Company InsightGo to article: Dassault Systèmes Company InsightGo to article: BriefingGo to article: News in NumbersGo to article: Latest NewsGo to article: Latest DealsGo to article: Project UpdatesGo to article: In DepthGo to article: Military SATCOM: is UK defence fit for purpose?Go to article: Critical fires: naval main guns maintain relevance Go to article: Australia’s multi-domain spending spreeGo to article: Analysis: Western artillery provision to Ukraine Go to article: Loitering munitions: from niche to necessityGo to article: Japan: reemergence of an Asia-Pacific powerGo to article: FLRAA: programme progress and global impactGo to article: British Army: Challenger 3 or Leopard 2A7s? Go to article: Diehl DefenceGo to article: Thematic TakeGo to article: Thematic Take: contentsGo to article: Foreword: Cybersecurity in the age of AI Go to article: Navigating the AI-driven cybersecurity landscapeGo to article: Key trends impacting cybersecurity Go to article: Timeline: a history of cybersecurity Go to article: Explainer: The most common types of cyberattacks Go to article: The impact of cybersecurity on defence Go to article: Case studies: cybersecurity in defence Go to article: Leading cybersecurity adopters and providers in defence Go to article: Latest news: Ukraine war dominant in cyber operationsGo to article: AI attacks now ‘the main cybersecurity concern’ for businesses across sectors Go to article: The state of cybersecurity: AI and geopolitics mean a bigger threat than ever Go to article: Companies’ own AI applications are ‘a huge cybersecurity problem’ Go to article: Sweden’s Nato accession: a cyberattack-filled saga Go to article: Germany recalls ambassador to Russia over cyberattacks Go to article: Why have cyberattacks in Poland spiked since Donald Tusk’s election? Go to article: How did China hack the UK Ministry of Defence? Go to article: Will IoT in defence continue to grow amid cybersecurity concerns? Go to article: AI Innovations wants to use semi-autonomous drones to save lives in Ukraine Go to article: Deal activity related to cybersecurity in the aerospace & defence industry since 2021  Go to article: Regulators must protect the cybersecurity market from a private equity takeover Go to article: GlobalData Thematic IntelligenceGo to article: Sponsored supplementsGo to article: ListingsGo to article: EventsGo to article: Event: Land ForcesGo to article: Excellence AwardsGo to article: Innovation RankingsGo to article: Buyer's GuidesGo to article: Frankfurt LaserGo to article: Next issue