Analyst Comment

Why sustainability reporting standards must be simple, consistent and transparent

Powered by

Sustainability reporting standards help set the strategic imperatives surrounding ESG that companies must follow. 

Initiatives surrounding sustainability reporting must continue to evolve to holistically encompass the sustainability of a company, no matter the industry or sector. 

On Tuesday, April 23, 2024, the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) announced that it was researching disclosure standards concerning the opportunities and risks relating to biodiversity, ecosystems, ecosystem services, and human capital

The research is designed to enhance more specific disclosures relating to a company’s credentials in these factors, thus providing investors and the public with better information on how companies approach and act on these values. Given the less-than-ideal ‘connection’ between ESG and the anti-woke movement globally, increasingly extensive sustainability reporting is in a difficult position.

Corporate social responsibility under fire

The responsibility of sustainability can be a difficult aspect of many companies’ operations and has become increasingly politicised, as legacy industries seek to preserve and enrich themselves to significant environmental expense. The weaponisation of the term ‘ESG’ is bad for the environment and damaging to sustainability agendas, and this extends to sustainability reporting standards. 

In 2023 there was a significant increase in ESG pushback in the US, with several states rejecting management of state retirement assets from financial service providers with notable ESG considerations, including BlackRock and Vanguard. 

In October 2023, the European Parliament fortunately rejected a proposal to scrap the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS)

Circumvention, avoidance, and absent data quality are all strategies companies have deployed to minimise the extent to which they publish data relating to the sustainability of their operations. By weakening political commitments and undermining reporting standards relating to ESG, companies are also able to reduce commitments to sustainability.

Sustainability reporting can be ‘choosey’

Picking the right standard can be difficult and many companies use this choice to obscure or highlight poor or positive performances in ESG factors. 

By building up reporting standards internationally, avoidance strategies and greenwashing cease to be effective means of hiding a company’s sustainability or lack thereof. As part of the move towards holistic, global ESG regulation, the sustainability standards themselves need to be simple and consistent to ensure functional compliance. As standards become more extensive, it is crucial that there is transparency surrounding companies’ ESG commitments, and the actions being made to achieve them. 

Demonstrative sustainability, which can be easily tracked and assessed for clarity, is key for the alignment of business success and ESG initiatives, and it begins with sustainability reporting standards.

Quality sustainability reporting

Aligning sustainability more closely with commercial success will enhance its credibility more broadly, with quality, transparent sustainability reporting a key component of this. 

Providing investors and the public more broadly with comprehensive, quality, and verifiable information surrounding ESG and how it relates to a company’s prospects is an important part of embedding sustainability in business practices. Responsible investing is good for businesses, economies, and the environment globally. By providing the public with expansive and quality information on the sustainability of a company, stakeholders can freely back green, climate-conscious choices

Rigorous reporting standards help to prevent greenwashing and will undeniably make it easier to achieve climate goals. It remains to be seen whether companies will embed principles of sustainability into business operations holistically, the ultimate end goal for sustainability standards setters.

GlobalData, the leading provider of industry intelligence, provided the underlying data, research, and analysis used to produce this article.

GlobalData’s Thematic Intelligence uses proprietary data, research, and analysis to provide a forward-looking perspective on the key themes that will shape the future of the world’s largest industries and the organisations within them.

Go to article: Home | Future soldier: data driven decisionsGo to article: Editor's letterGo to article: ContentsGo to article: Blücher Company InsightGo to article: BlücherGo to article: Bombardier Company InsightGo to article: BriefingGo to article: News in NumbersGo to article: Latest NewsGo to article: Latest DealsGo to article: Project UpdatesGo to article: Trends & InsightGo to article: J. Blaschke WehrtechnikGo to article: In DepthGo to article: Future soldier: data driven decisions Go to article: Tactical decision: Europe’s military airliftGo to article: Integrated masts: the sensor sweet spot Go to article: Military AI: autonomy and the machine Go to article: France plots next-gen future Go to article: Challenger 3: is the British Army’s new tank any good? Go to article: Interview: Crowbotics founder on AI no-code software Go to article: M10 Booker – filling an enduring gap Go to article: TSS InternationalGo to article: Thematic TakeGo to article: Thematic Take: contentsGo to article: Foreword: A growing sense of urgency in ESG Go to article: An introduction to the Internet of Things Go to article: ESG 1.0 is over – get ready for ESG 2.0 Go to article: ESG becomes mandatory: how to prepareGo to article: Theme timeline: the past, present and future of ESG Go to article: Net-zero strategies for the defence sectorGo to article: Leading defence companies in the race for net zero Go to article: GlobalData’s Christopher Papadopoullos on net-zero strategy for businesses Go to article: Latest news: ESG in defenceGo to article: Toxic artillery: Paradigm Shift Technologies on chrome plating Go to article: 38% of companies lack an ESG strategy – GlobalData survey Go to article: How is Russia weaponising ‘ecocide’ in Ukraine? Go to article: Environmental damage rampant across Ukraine and Gaza – CEOBS Go to article: What would orbiting nuclear weapons mean for the space economy? Go to article: Ethical constraints the biggest challenge for AI in defence Go to article: OpenAI faces protests for military applications, but the market is growing Go to article: How ‘AI killer robots’ are threatening global securityGo to article: Why sustainability reporting standards must be simple, consistent and transparentGo to article: Deal activity related to ESG in the aerospace & defence industry since 2021  Go to article: GlobalData Thematic IntelligenceGo to article: Sponsored supplementsGo to article: ApexOGo to article: ListingsGo to article: EventsGo to article: Excellence AwardsGo to article: Innovation RankingsGo to article: Buyer's GuidesGo to article: Next issue